![]() UPDATE (): Someone asked about HTML5 Benchmark and Browsermark, so I added them in but with the current versions of the browsers. Firefox's 圆4 branch (which is what PM is) is not ready for prime time and will often score lower on some benchmarks. UPDATE (): Since someone asked, PM 圆4 24.6.2 scored 1560 on PeaceKeeper. PM scored 1575 while FF hit 2139 (higher is better). ![]() UPDATE (): To see if the above still holds, I tested PM 24.6.2 and FF 31.0 on the same hardware as the above with PeaceKeeper. UPDATE: I added CyberFox 28.0 (CF) as well. I figured I'd post the comparison in case anyone wanted to see it side by side. And you sacrifice accessibility, compatibility, Firefox Sync, and quite a few languages in the process. So, Pale Moon doesn't seem to offer anything that Firefox doesn't already have. Here are the results for three popular browser benchmarks:įF 31.0: 7295, Total CPU Time: 14.46s, Total Lag: 168ms #Download pale moon 24.6.2 install#It's a fresh install of each before each test is run. The result is that Pale Moon is slower than Firefox.Īs an example, here is a comparison of the current releases of each, Pale Moon Portable 24.4 vs Firefox Portable 28.0. ![]() ![]() Pale Moon attempts to achieve speed by sacrificing some important bits like accessibility, but fails to achieve this goal by pinning to the outdated ESR branch of Firefox. We've had a few requests over the years to make Pale Moon available. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |